Publications

Rank and Order: Evaluating the Performance of SNPs for Individual Assignment in a Non-Model Organism.

Rank and Order: Evaluating the Performance of SNPs for Individual Assignment in a Non-Model Organism.

PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49018

Authors: Storer CG, Pascal CE, Roberts SB, Templin WD, Seeb LW, Seeb JE

Abstract
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are valuable tools for ecological and evolutionary studies. In non-model species, the use of SNPs has been limited by the number of markers available. However, new technologies and decreasing technology costs have facilitated the discovery of a constantly increasing number of SNPs. With hundreds or thousands of SNPs potentially available, there is interest in comparing and developing methods for evaluating SNPs to create panels of high-throughput assays that are customized for performance, research questions, and resources. Here we use five different methods to rank 43 new SNPs and 71 previously published SNPs for sockeye salmon: F(ST), informativeness (I(n)), average contribution to principal components (LC), and the locus-ranking programs BELS and WHICHLOCI. We then tested the performance of these different ranking methods by creating 48- and 96-SNP panels of the top-ranked loci for each method and used empirical and simulated data to obtain the probability of assigning individuals to the correct population using each panel. All 96-SNP panels performed similarly and better than the 48-SNP panels except for the 96-SNP BELS panel. Among the 48-SNP panels, panels created from F(ST), I(n), and LC ranks performed better than panels formed using the top-ranked loci from the programs BELS and WHICHLOCI. The application of ranking methods to optimize panel performance will become more important as more high-throughput assays become available.

PMID: 23185290 [PubMed - in process]

via pubmed: school of aquatic an… http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/23185290?dopt=Abstract

About these ads